Key result
Early post-discharge follow-up is linked to ~48% more ACS patients achieving recommended cholesterol targets.
Why the study?
The role of early follow-up in managing dyslipidaemia and improving lipid control after acute coronary syndrome had not been fully explored.
Does early post-discharge follow-up improve lipid control in ACS patients?
Does early post-discharge follow-up improve lipid control in ACS patients?
Early follow-up at 6-8 weeks post-discharge in ACS patients improves the proportion achieving guideline-directed lipid targets.
Early follow-up was associated with higher lipid target achievement post-ACS; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
Introduction The 2019 ESC guidelines for ACS recommend two follow-up visits within the first year post-discharge, primarily to assess left ventricular function recovery and ongoing ischaemia. [1] However, the role of early follow-up in managing dyslipidaemia and improving lipid control has not been fully explored. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in our centre, involving 5743 ACS patients, and found that 30% of patients were either not prescribed statins or remained on suboptimal doses 15 months post-discharge. This suboptimal lipid management was significantly associated with increased all-cause mortality over a 4-year period. Purpose The objective of this study was to evaluate the lipid response to high-dose statin therapy initiated during hospitalisation for ACS, and to determine whether an early follow-up visit can further improve lipid control, particularly in patients with suboptimal responses to initial therapy. Methods This cross-sectional observational study was conducted at a tertiary cardiac centre, focusing on ACS patients discharged after hospitalisation. Patients were reviewed in an early follow-up clinic 6-8 weeks post-discharge, with a second appointment at 6 months. Lipid profiles, including total cholesterol, LDL-C,non-HDL-C and triglycerides, were measured at both time points. Data were analysed to assess improvements in lipid control, with a specific focus on achieving the recommended cholesterol targets (total cholesterol <4 mmol/L, LDL-C <1.4 mmol/L, and non-HDL-C <2.1 mmol/L). In addition, lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] levels were measured to identify residual cardiovascular risk in patients meeting their lipid targets. Results A total of 565 ACS patients attended the first clinic appointment post-discharge. Compared to admission levels, there was a significant improvement in lipid profiles, with reductions in total cholesterol, LDL-C, non-HDL-C, and triglycerides. (Table 1) Of the patients who met their cholesterol targets, 6% had elevated Lp(a) levels (≥125 nmol/L), suggesting a residual risk despite achieving lipid targets. A subset of 53 patients attended the second follow-up appointment at 6 months. Among these, the proportion of patients who achieved the defined cholesterol targets significantly increased from 36.8% to 54.4% (P=0.048), indicating a positive effect of early follow-up and intervention. (figure 1) Conclusion The majority of ACS patients do not achieve their target cholesterol levels with high-intensity statin therapy alone. Early follow-up within 6-8 weeks post-discharge offers an opportunity for timely intervention, allowing for further modification of lipid profiles and risk factor management. Additionally, elevated Lp(a) levels represent a persistent cardiovascular risk even in those who achieve lipid targets, highlighting the need for further research into additional therapeutic strategies to address this residual risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkammash et al. (2025) studied this question. Early follow-up at 6-8 weeks post-discharge increased ACS patients meeting cholesterol targets from 36.8% to 54.4% (P=0.048), improving lipid control and reducing CV risk.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: