PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology4 citationsOpen Access

Experimental determination of effective X-ray attenuation coefficients of 3D-printed materials under clinical mammography spectra

ABAdrián BelarraIHIrene Hernández‐GirónJGJulia Garayoa

Key Points

  • To determine effective X-ray attenuation coefficients of various 3D-printed polymers for use in breast imaging.
  • Evaluated six types of 3D-printed materials and breast tissue-equivalent references.
  • Images were captured using two commercial mammography systems with varying configurations.
  • X-ray attenuation coefficients were derived using measurements, fitted to an empirical model.
  • Attenuation coefficients decreased with thickness due to beam hardening and scatter effects.
  • Identified relevant attenuation equivalences between 3D-printed materials and breast tissues within ±6%.
  • The empirical model demonstrated high accuracy in fit, preserving the ranking of attenuation values.

Abstract

Background 3D printing enables the fabrication of customized breast phantoms for image quality assessment in digital mammography (DM) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). A major challenge is the absence of standardized, accessible methods to characterize the attenuation properties of 3D-printed materials under clinical DM/DBT spectra. Methods An experimental framework was implemented to determine the effective X-ray attenuation coefficient ( μ eff ) of six 3D-printed polymers (PLA, PET, resin, ABS, ABS+, HIPS) and reference breast tissue-equivalent materials (CIRS plates simulating different breast glandular/adipose ratios (BR) and PMMA) using two commercial DM/DBT systems, with and without anti-scatter grid. Step-wedges (0.5–5.5 cm) were imaged across multiple kVp and filter settings. The μ eff were obtained from measurements on images and fitted to an empirical model yielding μ 0 (attenuation at thickness tending to zero) and k (decay rate) to characterize beam hardening and scatter influences. 3D-reference material equivalences were evaluated based on μ eff and μ 0 . Results Beam hardening and scatter reduced μ eff with thickness, by 6%–14% with grid and 12%–28% without grid, with scatter contributing 47%–76% of the reduction in no-grid acquisitions. No significant differences were observed between the two mammography systems. Based on μ eff values, attenuation equivalences (within ±6%) were identified between 3D-printed and reference breast tissue-equivalent materials: PLA with BR 100/0; PET and resin with BR 70/30 and PMMA; ABS+ with BR 30/70 and BR 50/50. ABS and HIPS showed larger mismatches. The empirical model achieved excellent fits (R 2 0.99), with μ 0 values preserving attenuation ranking and enabling derivation of equivalent glandular proportions. Conclusion This framework demonstrates that routine clinical mammography systems can be used directly, without specialized instrumentation, to characterize 3D-printed materials as tissue surrogates. Several low-cost, widely available polymers were shown to reproduce breast tissue attenuation, supporting the local fabrication of anthropomorphic breast phantoms for realistic and clinically relevant image quality evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Belarra et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698827f00fc35cd7a8846fa7https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2025.1719551
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper