⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

February 5, 2026Asian Journal of PhilosophyOpen Access

Replies to comments on Belief as Emotion

Miriam Schleifer McCormick

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Key Points

The aim is to clarify key ideas presented in the book 'Belief as Emotion' and respond to critiques.
Analyzes comments on the book
Clarifies central theses of the argument
Engages with existing literature on belief and emotion
Clarified the nature of belief as an emotional state
Addressed misconceptions from critiques
Reaffirmed the book’s central arguments

Implication

This commentary clarifies central theses and addresses critiques in belief and emotion theory.

Abstract

I respond to comments about my book Belief as Emotion , clarifying some of its central theses.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Miriam Schleifer McCormick (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828010fc35cd7a8847208 https://doi.org/10.1007/s44204-025-00371-y

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Replies to CommentatorsOriginal Research · 2025
2Virtue and its moral psychology2024
3Comments on Expressivenesss: Perception and Emotions in the Experience of Expressive Objects2025
4Talking about: a response to Bowker, Keiser, Michaelson2024
5The Belief of Belief: On Consciousness, Identity, and the Architecture of What We Accept as TrueOriginal Research · 2026

More related papers

The Case for the Reactive View of Emotion2026
Replies to commentators2024
Navigating new ‘social relations of believability': A response2025

More from Asian Journal of Philosophy

A multi-timescale interpretation of Bergson’s theory of pure memoryTue,
You idiotThu,