Comparative evaluation shows puerarin effectively reduces neuronal excitability in orofacial pain management, indicating its potential benefit.
Trigeminal neuralgia and orofacial pain often require effective local anesthesia with minimal side effects. Puerarin (PUE), a major bioactive flavonoid derived from Pueraria lobata, has shown potential analgesic properties. This study aimed to investigate the inhibitory effects of local PUE administration on the excitability of wide-dynamic-range (WDR) neurons in the spinal trigeminal nucleus caudalis (SpVc) and to compare its potency with the conventional local anesthetic lidocaine. Extracellular single-unit recordings were performed on SpVc WDR neurons in anesthetized rats. PUE (1 and 10 mM) or lidocaine (37 mM; 1%) was administered subcutaneously into the peripheral receptive field. Neuronal responses to graded non-noxious and noxious mechanical stimuli were quantified before and after drug application. Local administration of PUE significantly suppressed the mean firing frequency of SpVc WDR neurons in a dose-dependent and reversible manner. The inhibitory effect peaked at 10 min post-injection and recovered within 30 min. Notably, 10 mM PUE exerted an inhibitory magnitude (68.7 ± 6.4%) comparable to that of 37 mM lidocaine (58.1 ± 4.3%), indicating that PUE possesses approximately four-fold the inhibitory potency of lidocaine on a molar basis. The suppressive effect was consistent across both non-noxious and noxious stimulus intensities. These findings provide the first in vivo evidence that PUE effectively attenuates trigeminal nociceptive transmission, likely via the modulation of voltage-gated sodium channels and acid-sensing ionic channels at peripheral nerve terminals. As a natural dietary constituent with high potency and a low risk of systemic side effects, PUR represents a promising candidate for complementary and alternative medicine in the management of orofacial pain, such as temporomandibular disorders and trigeminal neuralgia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hirano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: