Key result
Zotarolimus-eluting stents show similar 2-year MACE rates in complex versus non-complex lesions.
Why the study?
Does PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents for complex lesions increase major adverse cardiac events compared to non-complex lesions in patients undergoing PCI?
Observational (n=795)
Yes
Does PCI with zotarolimus-eluting stents for complex lesions increase major adverse cardiac events compared to non-complex lesions in patients undergoing PCI?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Zotarolimus-eluting stents demonstrate comparable and favorable 2-year clinical outcomes in both complex and non-complex coronary lesions in a real-world Japanese registry.
Background Drug-eluting stents (DES) have significantly advanced in 21st century, which enabled percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to challenge more complex lesions. It is also known that Japanese PCI operators are relatively familiar with complex PCI. However, its real-world data regarding PCI procedure and its outcome is not sufficient. We aimed to compare clinical outcome between complex lesions and non-complex using all-comers zotarolimus-eluting stent (ZES) registry in Japan. Methods This was an all-comer registry of ZES from 65 institutes in Japan. Complex lesion was defined as chronic total occlusion (CTO), left main disease, bifurcation lesion requiring 2-stent technique, lesions requiring debulking device, number of stents 3 or greater and total length of stents >60mm. Major adverse cardiac events included cardiac death, spontaneous myocardial infarction and target lesion revascularization and followed for 2-years. Patients’ characteristics, procedure characteristics and MACE were compared between complex lesions and non-complex lesions. Results A total of 795 patients including 246 patients with complex lesions and 549 patients with non-complex lesions were finally analyzed. The most frequent reason selected for complex lesions was CTO (35.4%) followed by long stenting (35.4%), need of debulking device (28.9%) and left main disease (10.2%). Intravascular imaging was used in more than 99% of all populations. Cumulative incidence of MACE at 2-years were similar between complex lesions and non-complex lesions. (4.9% versus 3.8%, P=0.49). Conclusion ZES showed decent clinical result in complex lesions and non-complex lesions from Japanese real-world data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
H M Mori (2025) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (n=795). Complex lesions vs. Non-complex lesions was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization) (p=0.49). In patients receiving zotarolimus-eluting stents, complex lesions had a similar 2-year incidence of major adverse cardiac events compared to non-complex lesions (4.9% vs 3.8%, P=0.49).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: