PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Outcomes of coronary artery aneurysms: insights from the Coronary Artery Ectasia and Aneurysm Registry (CAESAR)

View Full Paper
ACAlessandro CandrevaJHJessica HuwilerUniversity of ZurichDGDiego Gallo

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate the clinical characteristics, angiographic patterns, and long-term outcomes of patients with coronary artery ectasias and aneurysms.
  • Retrospective analysis of 281 patients diagnosed with CAE/CAA via coronary angiography.
  • Evaluation of major adverse cardiovascular events, including all-cause death and myocardial infarction.
  • Time-dependent event risk assessment using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves.
  • CAEs often exhibited multi-district distribution (45.8%), whereas CAAs showed a single-vessel pattern (80%).
  • Major adverse cardiovascular events occurred in 14.3% of patients during hospitalisation and 38.1% during follow-up.
  • The presence of CAAs increased the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events with a hazard ratio of 2.26.
  • Non-fatal myocardial infarction risk was significantly higher in patients with CAAs, HR=5.00.

Abstract

Background: Coronary artery ectasias and aneurysms (CAE/CAAs) are among the less common forms of coronary artery disease, with undefined long-term outcomes and treatment strategies. Aims: To assess the clinical characteristics, angiographic patterns, and long-term outcomes in patients with CAE, CAA, or both. Methods: This 15-year (2006-2021) retrospective single-centre registry included 281 patients diagnosed with CAE/CAA via invasive coronary angiography. Major adverse cardiovascular events included all-cause death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unplanned ischaemia-driven revascularisation, hospitalisation for heart failure, cerebrovascular events, and clinically overt bleeding. Time-dependent event risks for the CAE and CAA groups were assessed using Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: CAEs (n = 161, 57.3%) often had a multi-district distribution (45.8%), while CAAs (78, 27.8%) exhibited a single-vessel pattern (80%). The co-existence of CAAs and CAE was observed in 42 cases (14.9%), and multi-vessel obstructive coronary artery disease was prevalent (55.9% overall). Rates of major adverse cardiovascular events were 14.3% in-hospital and 38.1% at a median follow-up of 18.9 (interquartile range IQR 6.0-39.9) months. The presence of CAAs was associated with increased major adverse cardiovascular events risk in comparison to CAE (hazard ratio HR = 2.26, 95% confidence interval CI 1.38-3.69, p = 0.001), driven by a higher hazard ratio of non-fatal myocardial infarctions (HR = 5.00, 95% CI 1.66-15.0, p = 0.004) and unplanned ischaemia-driven revascularisation in both dilated (HR = 3.23, 95% CI 1.40-7.45, p = 0.006) and non-dilated coronary artery segments (HR 3.83, 95% CI 2.08-7.07, p = 0.001). Conclusions: Overlap between obstructive and dilated coronary artery disease is frequent. Among the spectrum of dilated coronary artery disease, the presence of a CAA was associated with worse long-term outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Candreva et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828410fc35cd7a88479e5https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-290595
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper