Observational study evaluates inflammatory biomarker associations with lesion types in mild traumatic brain injury, suggesting limited diagnostic value.
Background: Routine admission inflammatory and metabolic biomarkers have been proposed as adjunctive tools in mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). However, their association with specific traumatic intracranial lesion types remains unclear. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study including adult patients with isolated mTBI who underwent head computed tomography (CT) on admission. Admission laboratory parameters included the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), and glucose-to-potassium ratio (GPR). Two predefined endpoints were assessed. The first compared biomarker values between CT-positive and CT-negative patients. The second evaluated associations between biomarkers and individual intracranial lesion subtypes, including analyses restricted to isolated lesions. Results: A total of 125 patients were included, of whom 95 (76%) were CT-positive. No significant differences were observed between CT-positive and CT-negative patients for PLR (p = 0.793), GPR (p = 0.531), or SII (p = 0.291). In lesion-specific analyses including all intracranial injuries, subdural hematoma (SDH) was associated with higher GPR compared with patients without SDH (p = 0.016). In analyses restricted to patients with isolated lesions, SDH was associated with higher PLR (p = 0.018) and higher GPR (p = 0.015). No significant associations were observed between any biomarker and intraparenchymal hemorrhage, subarachnoid hemorrhage, or epidural hematoma (all p > 0.05). Patients with multiple intracranial injuries exhibited higher PLR (p = 0.012) and higher SII (p = 0.021) compared with those with isolated lesions. After correction for multiple comparisons, none of the observed associations remained statistically significant. Conclusions: These findings suggest that routine systemic biomarkers have limited global discriminatory value in mTBI. Exploratory lesion-specific associations with SDH did not remain significant after correction for multiple comparisons, underscoring the preliminary nature of these findings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lampros et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: