Key result
RHYTHMIA mapping demonstrates safety and feasibility for catheter ablation in pediatric patients under 20 kg.
Why the study?
Procedural experience with the RHYTHMIA high-density mapping system in pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg is limited.
Does the RHYTHMIA mapping system provide comparable mapping parameters and safety in pediatric patients weighing <20 kg compared to those ≥20 kg undergoing ablation for supraventricular arrhythmias?
Does the RHYTHMIA mapping system provide comparable mapping parameters and safety in pediatric patients weighing <20 kg compared to those ≥20 kg undergoing ablation for supraventricular arrhythmias?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The RHYTHMIA high-density mapping system is technically feasible and safe for catheter ablation of supraventricular arrhythmias in pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg.
Background Catheter ablation in pediatric patients remains technically challenging. The RHYTHMIA high‐density mapping system is increasingly used in pediatric electrophysiology; however, procedural experience in patients weighing less than 20 kg is limited. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 125 pediatric patients who underwent catheter ablation for supraventricular arrhythmias using the RHYTHMIA system. The patients were divided into two groups according to body weight: ≥20 kg group ( n = 111) and the <20 kg group ( n = 14). The mapping time, number of mapping beats, and mapping electrodes were compared for the right atrium (RA), and left atrium (LA), along with the manual re‐annotation points and incidence of complications. Results A total of 184 maps were analyzed. No significant differences were found in mapping time, accepted beats, and electrograms (RA, ≥20 kg group [ n = 104] vs. <20 kg group [ n = 11]; mapping time, 13.8 min[10.1–18.3] vs. 17.4 min[9.4–25.3], p = 0.95; accepted beats, 744 beats[548–1095] vs. 953 beats[654–1079], p = 0.57; electrograms, 6871 electrograms[5074–10885] vs. 6650 electrograms[4474–9527], p = 0.30) (LA, ≥20 kg group [ n = 62] vs. <20 kg group [ n = 7]; mapping time, 11.5 min[8.1–18.3] vs. 14.5 min[8.5–15.4], p = 0.97; accepted beats, 619 beats[354–1007] vs. 512 beats[316–810], p = 0.89; electrograms, 6809 electrograms[4025–10108] vs. 4338 electrograms[3369–8693], p = 0.93). In the RA, <20 kg group required more re‐annotations than ≥20 kg group, while no significant differences in complications were observed between the groups. Conclusions Use of the RHYTHMIA mapping system in carefully selected pediatric patients weighing less than 20 kg was technically feasible and not associated with major procedural complications. These findings support its cautious use with appropriate case selection and operator vigilance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sasaki et al. (2026) studied this question. The RHYTHMIA mapping system was technically feasible and safe for catheter ablation in pediatric patients under 20 kg, with no major procedural complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: