This analysis demonstrates improved MPPT performance in PEM fuel cells using machine learning, indicating a robust control strategy for varying conditions.
Proton exchange membrane fuel cells (PEMFCs) are attractive energy sources for clean and efficient power generation; however, their nonlinear characteristics and sensitivity to operating condition variations make maximum power point tracking (MPPT) a challenging control problem. Conventional MPPT techniques often exhibit slow convergence, steady-state oscillations, and degraded performance under dynamic fuel flow variations. This paper proposes a machine learning–driven MPPT control strategy for a PEMFC system integrated with a DC–DC boost converter. The MPPT problem is formulated as a supervised classification task, where machine learning classifiers generate duty-cycle commands to regulate the converter and ensure operation at the maximum power point. A detailed PEMFC–converter model is developed in MATLAB/Simulink-2025b, and a dataset of 3000 labeled samples is generated under varying fuel flow conditions. Several classification algorithms, including decision trees, support vector machines (SVM), k-nearest neighbors (kNN), and ensemble learning methods, are systematically evaluated within an identical simulation framework. Simulation results show that the proposed machine learning-based MPPT controller significantly improves dynamic and steady-state performance. Ensemble Boosted Trees achieve the best overall response with a settling time of approximately 32 ms, peak power overshoot below 4.5%, and steady-state power ripple limited to 1.5%. Quadratic SVM and weighted kNN classifiers also demonstrate stable tracking behavior with power ripple below 2.1%, while overly complex models such as Cubic SVM suffer from large oscillations and reduced accuracy. These results confirm that classification-based machine learning offers an effective, fast, and robust MPPT solution for PEMFC systems under dynamic operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bilhan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: