PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026Frontiers in Immunology4 citationsOpen Access

Diversity and function of tumor-associated macrophages in brain metastases: mechanisms and therapeutic prospects

YMYingping MaHWHao WangHCHao Chen

Key Points

  • To examine the diverse roles and functions of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in brain metastases and their potential therapeutic targets.
  • Analyzed the characteristics and heterogeneity of TAMs in brain metastases.
  • Discussed mechanisms of TAM polarization and regulation through different signaling pathways.
  • Reviewed the roles of TAMs in tumor progression and their interactions with the tumor microenvironment.
  • TAMs contribute to tumor progression via immunosuppression and disruption of the blood-brain barrier.
  • Various TAM subpopulations were identified, challenging the traditional M1/M2 classification.
  • Targeting TAMs with therapies may improve outcomes in patients with brain metastases.

Abstract

Brain metastasis significantly worsens prognosis in late-stage cancer., with Its treatment hindered by the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. Within this environment, tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) represent the predominant immune population. Through their roles in immune modulation, angiogenesis, and tumor invasion, TAMs are critical drivers of disease progression. TAMs are highly heterogeneous. While traditionally categorized into M1 (anti-tumor) or M2 (pro-tumor) phenotypes, this dichotomy is an oversimplification. Recent single-cell studies have revealed a spectrum of functional subpopulations, such as lipid-associated, interferon-responsive, and pro-angiogenic TAMs, with M2-like states typically prevailing to mediate immunosuppression. This review explores the diversity and functions of TAMs in brain metastasis. We first detail their biological characteristics, including origins, heterogeneous subtype classifications (e.g., lipid-associated macrophages that extend beyond the simple M1/M2 dichotomy), and polarization states. We further discuss how polarization is regulated by signaling pathways (e.g., STAT, NF-κB) and microenvironmental factors (e.g., hypoxia, metabolic reprogramming). We examine TAM roles from pre-metastatic niche formation to tumor colonization, using breast and lung cancer brain metastases to illustrate how TAMs disrupt the BBB and facilitate immune evasion through molecules like ANGPTL4 (angiopoietin-like 4) and MMP9. Key pathways of TAM-tumor cell interactions, including neuro-cancer interactions, immune-metabolic regulation, and exosome-mediated communication, are also discussed. Targeting TAMs offers promising therapeutic avenues. These strategies include reprogramming TAMs (e.g., using CSF1R inhibitors), combining TAM-targeted therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors, and developing novel approaches such as nanotechnology and CAR-macrophages. However, several challenges remain, including TAM heterogeneity, lack of targeting specificity, and the obstacle of BBB delivery. Future research should leverage technologies like single-cell sequencing and spatial transcriptomics to decode TAM heterogeneity, and develop personalized treatments based on biomarkers such as GPNMB and TRAIL, aiming to improve patient outcomes in brain metastasis.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828770fc35cd7a8847fa6https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2026.1756299
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper