Laboratory and field tests evaluate the thermal efficiency of PCM wallboards in solar greenhouses, suggesting improved heating strategies for winter nights.
Highlights A novel CaCl2·6H2O–MgCl2·6H2O (30%)–SrCl2·6H2O (1%) composite phase-change material (PCM) was developed. The composite PCM achieved a phase-change temperature of 20–21.1°C and a minimal supercooling degree of 0.3–0.4°C at ambient temperatures of 5–10°C. A method for determining optimal wallboard thickness was established, identifying 2–3 cm as the ideal range for solar greenhouses in Urumqi. A 2-cm thick wallboard demonstrated superior heat release, outperforming 3-cm, 4-cm, and 5-cm panels and brick walls by 14%, 89%, 34%, and 36%, respectively, on clear winter nights. ABSTRACT. In this study, a composite phase-change material (PCM) was developed through the modification of CaCl2·6H2O with MgCl2·6H2O and SrCl2·6H2O to mitigate low nighttime temperatures in Chinese solar greenhouses (CSGs) during winter. The optimal CaCl2·6H2O–MgCl2·6H2O (30%)–SrCl2·6H2O (1%) composite PCM exhibited a phase-transition temperature of 20–21.1°C and a minimal supercooling degree of 0.3–0.4°C at ambient temperatures of 5–10°C. The formulated PCM was incorporated into wallboards with varying thicknesses (2–5 cm). Laboratory experiments and field tests in a Urumqi CSG revealed that on a typical clear winter night, the 2-cm-thick phase-change wallboard released the most heat (2.79 MJ/m 2 ) and significantly outperformed thicker panels and conventional brick walls. Therefore, a wallboard thickness of 2 cm was identified as optimal for balancing heat storage and release efficiency under the tested conditions. These findings provide a practical strategy for improving the thermal environment in CSGs, particularly during winter nights.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: