PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Heart Journal0 citations

Inflammation and LDL cholesterol contribute independently to the progression of early human atherosclerotic plaque

View Full Paper
GBG Mendieta BadimonSPS J PocockDTD Taylor

Key Points

  • To explore how inflammation and LDL cholesterol contribute to the progression of subclinical atherosclerosis in middle-aged individuals.
  • Analyzed a cohort from the PESA study with median age 45 years
  • Conducted serial blood tests and physical exams over three visits
  • Assessed vascular health using 3D ultrasound and coronary artery calcium scoring
  • Employed multiple linear regression models to identify key predictors of global plaque volume at 6-year follow-up.
  • 58% of participants had some degree of subclinical atherosclerosis after 6 years
  • Average white blood cell count and fibrinogen were significantly associated with greater global plaque volume
  • Mean oxidized LDL had a weaker association with plaque volume, while hs-CRP and Lp(a) did not show significant effects
  • Inflammation and LDL cholesterol are predictive of plaque progression but operate independently.

Abstract

Abstract Background The role of inflammatory processes in the risk of ischemic events (despite intensive lipid-lowering treatment) has received considerable attention in recent years, mainly amongst secondary prevention patients. Both dyslipidemia and inflammation contribute to the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, and both predict future ischemic events. However, the interplay between lipids and inflammation in the early phases of human atherosclerosis i.e., subclinical atherosclerosis (SA) and primary prevention is largely unknown. Objectives To investigate the relative contribution of inflammation and LDLc as determinants of risk of SA progression in a cohort of middle-aged, asymptomatic individuals. Methods Participants from the PESA study (median age 45 years, 36% female) underwent 3 visits (at 3-year intervals) involving serial blood testing, physical examinations, 3D vascular ultrasound assessments of peripheral arteries (bilateral carotids and femorals), and coronary artery calcium scoring (CACS). Multiple linear regression models with global plaque volume (GPV, mm3) at 6-year follow-up (FU) as the primary outcome were performed to investigate its key determinants, first based on standard cardiovascular risk factors (i.e., smoking, diabetes, systolic blood pressure, and LDLc) and then followed by the potential additional role of mean levels of inflammatory markers white blood cell count (WBC), fibrinogen, oxidized LDL (oxLDL), and high-sensitivity C reactive protein (hs-CRP) and lipoprotein a Lp(a). Results The 3,471 participants had mostly low risk lipid profiles according to current guidelines, and 2,013 (58%) had some SA (GPV 0mm3) at 6-year FU. Overall, mean WBC and mean fibrinogen had highly significant associations with the extent of GPV at 6-year FU after adjusting for age, sex and CVRFs. Mean oxLDL showed a weaker, yet significant association with greater GPV at 6-year FU, but hs-CRP and Lp(a) did not. WBC had the strongest statistical associations with extent of SA, equivalent in strength to the known link of LDLc with SA, followed by fibrinogen (Figure 1). For WBC the marked trend in risk only occurred at levels above its median. Baseline LDLc and the mean inflammatory marker levels predicted GPV at 6 years alongside each other but not in a synergistic manner (i.e., no statistical interactions in determining GPV at 6 years were found). Similar patterns were observed for separate analyses of femoral plaque, carotid plaque and CACS (Figure 2). Conclusion In a cohort of middle-aged, asymptomatic individuals without dyslipidemia according to current standards, both LDLc and inflammation (especially WBC) are associated with progression of SA, but independently of each other. Our results suggest inflammatory risk is relevant across the life continuum of atherosclerosis and should not be regarded as only a residual risk in secondary prevention.Figure 1 Figure 2

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Badimon et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828850fc35cd7a8848225https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf784.3615
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper