PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

General movements and neurodevelopmental outcomes at 2 years of age in infants born very preterm

View Full Paper
NYNinib YakoubMAMarieken AsprionSBStephanie Brezina

Key Points

  • To examine how the quality of general movements relates to developmental outcomes at 2 years in infants born very preterm.
  • Conducted a retrospective cohort study of infants born before 32 weeks' gestation
  • Assessed general movements using the Motor Optimality Score-Revised at 3 months corrected age
  • Evaluated cognitive, language, and motor skills at 2 years using the Bayley Scales
  • Study included 316 infants, with a median MOS-R total score of 23
  • Higher MOS-R scores were linked to better cognitive and motor development scores
  • Associations weakened after considering socioeconomic factors and severe neonatal morbidities

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the relationship between quality of general movements and neurodevelopmental outcomes in 2-year-old infants born very preterm (VPT). Method: This was a retrospective cohort study including infants born before 32 weeks' gestation. General movements video recordings at 3 months corrected age were assessed with the Motor Optimality Score-Revised (MOS-R) and child cognitive, language, and motor development at 2 years with the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, Third Edition. Results: The study included 316 infants (52.5% male, mean SD gestational age 28.7 2.3 weeks, birthweight z-score -0.14 0.85). The median MOS-R total score was 23. The mean cognitive composite, language, and motor scores were 102.0 (15.4), 92.1 (16.1), and 95.8 (15.3) respectively. Higher MOS-R total scores were related to better cognitive (p = 0.025) and motor development (p = 0.042). However, associations weakened when controlling for socioeconomic status, gestational age, birthweight, sex, and number of severe neonatal morbidities (i.e. severe brain lesion, necrotizing enterocolitis, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, and retinopathy of prematurity). Interpretation: While the quality of general movements at 3 months corrected age is associated with the infant's cognitive and motor development at 2 years corrected age, it might have no incremental predictive power beyond socioeconomic status and the number of severe neonatal morbidities.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Yakoub et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828990fc35cd7a8848401https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-291004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Trajectories of detailed general movements and their association with one-year developmental outcomes in very preterm, moderate-to-late preterm, and term infants.2026
  2. 2Early Intervention Guided by the General Movements Examination at Term Corrected Age—Short Term Outcomes2024 · 7 citations
  3. 3The qualitative assessment of general movements in preterm, term and young infants--review of the methodology.1997
  4. 4Development of Movement and Postural Patterns in Full-Term Infants Who Are at Low Risk in Belgium, India, Norway, and the United States2024 · 1 citations
  5. 5Motor Difficulties at 12 Years of Age Were Common in Children Born Very Preterm and Were Associated With ROP and Motor Performance in Infancy2026