PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20264 citations

Expanding the horizons of cancer therapy with next-generation 4-1BB agonists: a review of molecular and clinical strategies to maximize efficacy and ensure safety.

View Full Paper
GYGihoon YouJCJungwoo ChoiCYChorong Yang

Key Points

  • To analyze the advancements in 4-1BB agonists for cancer therapy focusing on efficacy and safety improvements.
  • Review of molecular design strategies for 4-1BB agonists
  • Analysis of clinical data on bispecific versus monospecific antibodies
  • Discussion of combination therapy strategies involving 4-1BB signaling
  • Next-generation bispecific antibodies show enhanced antitumor efficacy compared to first-generation variants
  • These bispecific antibodies offer better safety profiles
  • 4-1BB signaling is critical for sustaining durable anti-tumor responses

Abstract

Driven by the substantial limitations of first generation 4-1BB agonists urelumab and utomilumab, the field has shifted toward engineering next-generation molecules with improved therapeutic windows. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of this evolution, detailing how key molecular design strategies are used to restrict 4-1BB activation to the tumor microenvironment. We summarize available clinical data, highlighting that 4-1BB bispecific antibodies exhibit superior antitumor efficacy and more favorable safety profiles compared with their monospecific predecessors. Furthermore, we discuss strong rationale for combination strategies, emphasizing how 4-1BB signaling provides the crucial costimulatory signal necessary to sustain durable anti-tumor responses. In summary, this review elucidates the scientific basis of antibody engineering aimed at improving safety and tumor-selective activation of 4-1BB agonists and outlines future directions for optimizing their clinical application in cancer immunotherapy.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

You et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828cb0fc35cd7a88489cehttps://doi.org/10.1080/19420862.2026.2622746
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A phase 1, dose escalation/dose-expansion study of QLF31907, a bispecific antibody (BsAb) targeting PD-L1 and 4-1BB, in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma.2024 · 2 citations
  2. 2Axicabtagene Ciloleucel CAR T-Cell Therapy in Refractory Large B-Cell Lymphoma2017 · 6,071 citations
  3. 3An open label, phase 1b/2 trial of LVGN6051 (4-1BB agonistic antibody) combined with anlotinib for refractory soft tissue sarcoma (STS).2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Abstract 1838: LBL-024, an anti-PD-L1 and 4-1BB bispecific antibody with highly differentiated binding affinity, shows anti-tumor efficacy in a mouse tumor model2021 · 3 citations
  5. 5AGEN2373 is a conditionally-active agonist antibody targeting the costimulatory receptor CD137 for the treatment of human malignancies.2019 · 1 citations