Key result
SGLT2 inhibitors are linked to ~34% lower MACE risk in diabetic patients without heart failure.
Why the study?
Do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in adult patients with type 2 diabetes without heart failure, stratified by insulin use?
Cohort (n=1,085,262)
Yes
Do SGLT2 inhibitors reduce major adverse cardiovascular events in adult patients with type 2 diabetes without heart failure, stratified by insulin use?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
SGLT2 inhibitors are associated with a significantly reduced risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes without a history of heart failure, regardless of concurrent insulin use.
Background Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are proven to reduce cardiovascular death and the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with a diagnosis of heart failure. The real-world benefits of SGLT2i in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) without a prior diagnosis of heart failure among insulin users versus non-users are unknown. Objective To improve understanding of the morbidity and mortality benefit of SGLT2i among patients with T2DM without heart failure. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study using a de-identified national database with over 113 million patients (TriNetX Research Network, Cambridge, MA; IRB exempt). We identified all adult patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with DM on or after January 1st 2014. We excluded patients with a diagnosis of heart failure, acute myocardial infarction or cerebral infarction and then stratified patients into groups by use of insulin and SGLT2i. We examined the outcomes of acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cerebral infarction, and cardiovascular death after index diagnosis. We performed a 1:1 greedy nearest neighbor propensity score matching to balance cohorts on age, race, and traditional risk factors for cardiometabolic disease. Estimates of risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to describe outcome risks. P-values of <0.05 were considered statistically significant. Results Using the TriNetX database, we identified a total of 625,030 propensity score matched patients with DM using insulin. Of these patients, those on SGLT2i (50%), 18.6% had incident MACE versus 28.3% among those not on SGLT2i with a risk ratio of 0.66 (95% CI 0.651, 0.664). Of the 460,232 patients in the propensity matched cohort of patients with DM without insulin use, those on SGLT2i therapy (50%) had a lower risk of MACE of 4.8% compared to 9.4% among those without SGLT2i use (risk ratio of 0.51, 95% CI 0.497, 0.520). Conclusion Insulin use is associated with higher risk of MACE compared with no insulin use. SGLT2i are associated with reduced MACE in patients with DM without a history of heart failure both among those with and without the use of insulin. All patients with diabetes may benefit from the inclusion of an SGLT2i in their regimen to reduce their risk of future cardiovascular events.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wilgor et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Type 2 diabetes mellitus without heart failure (n=1,085,262). Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) vs. No SGLT2i use was evaluated on Incident MACE (acute myocardial infarction, coronary revascularization, cerebral infarction, and cardiovascular death) (RR 0.66, 95% CI 0.651-0.664). SGLT2i use was associated with a lower risk of MACE in diabetic patients without heart failure, both among insulin users (RR 0.66; 95% CI 0.651-0.664) and non-users (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.497-0.520).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: