Prospective cohort study shows AID reduces diabetic retinopathy in adults with T1D, suggesting benefits for diabetic management.
Aims: To evaluate the impact of automated insulin delivery (AID) systems on the incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) compared with multiple daily injections (MDI). Methods: This prospective cohort study followed 379 adults with T1D for a mean of 4.9 ± 1.4 years. DR was assessed via standardized retinal imaging. At baseline, 80 participants used AID, and 35 initiated AID during follow-up; 264 remained on MDI. Outcomes included baseline DR prevalence, incident DR, and DR progression. Multivariate Poisson and Cox regression models adjusted for key covariates (age, diabetes duration, pre-baseline HbA 1c ) were used, with propensity score-matched and HbA1c trajectory analyses as sensitivity checks. Results: DR prevalence at baseline was 13.9% with no group differences. Incident DR was lower among AID users (6.1% vs. 18.9% in MDI; hazard ratio = 0.33, 95% confidence interval: 0.13–0.73; P = 0.01; number needed to treat = 8). DR progression and all vision-threatening events occurred only in the MDI group (41.7% vs. 0%; P < 0.001). Use of AID systems resulted in a greater reduction in HbA 1c compared with MDI (−0.32% vs. −0.06%; P = 0.01). Conclusions: AID systems were associated with improved glycemic control and reduced incidence and progression of DR in adults with T1D. These findings support AID use to prevent early microvascular complications.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nattero-Chávez et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: