PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 2026European Journal of Human Genetics0 citationsOpen Access

Public and parent perspectives on genomic sequencing in newborn screening: a scoping review

SSSaskia G. SmitsSOSuzanne M. OnstwedderTRTessel Rigter

Key Points

  • To explore public and parent perspectives on genomic sequencing in newborn screening and identify their concerns and preferences.
  • Conducted a scoping review of literature between 2005 and August 2024.
  • Performed literature searches in Embase and Psych-abs databases.
  • Included 27 articles describing 20 studies from 7 countries, primarily focusing on survey studies.
  • Public and parents expressed positive interest in genomic sequencing but preferred standard newborn screening.
  • Key perceived benefits included health gains for newborns and parental preparedness.
  • Concerns centered on data privacy, insurance discrimination, and psychological impact of results.
  • Limited concerns regarding test accuracy or uncertain results were noted.
  • Preferences for decision-making and informed consent processes were highlighted.

Abstract

Abstract Newborn screening (NBS) aims to identify rare but treatable conditions in newborns to offer early interventions. The possibilities of genomic sequencing are being researched to further strengthen NBS. This scoping review explores public and parent perspectives on genomic sequencing in NBS. We performed a literature search in Embase and Psych-abs databases to find relevant articles from 2005 until August 2024. Twenty-seven articles describing 20 studies from 7 countries were included, mostly describing survey studies. The public and parents reported a positive interest in genomic sequencing in NBS, but were overall more willing to participate in standard NBS compared to genomic NBS. Respondents’ perceived benefits of genomic NBS included increased health gain for newborns, preparedness for parents and their child, enabling family planning, and benefits for other family members and population health. Most perceived concerns related to the storage and privacy of genomic sequencing data, fear of insurance discrimination, and psychological worries as a result of genomic sequencing test results. Articles reported limited public concerns regarding test accuracy or the possibility of receiving uncertain results. Preferences on how genomic sequencing should be offered were mentioned regarding decision-making and informed consent, result delivery, data storage, and program offer and costs. In conclusion, the public and parents seem generally supportive of genomic sequencing in NBS. However, to uphold support and participation comparable with current NBS programs, arguments and beliefs of the public and parents should be further explored if genomic sequencing is to be successfully implemented into or alongside NBS programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Smits et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698828eb0fc35cd7a8848de9https://doi.org/10.1038/s41431-026-02024-x
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper