PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 8, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Definition of the Geometric Inconsistency Test (GIT)

View Full Paper
CKCueneyt KayaDBDetlev W. Buck

Key Points

  • To define the Geometric Inconsistency Test (GIT) as a criterion for excluding certain scalar descriptions under specific evaluations.
  • Establishes GIT as a protocol-level, structural criterion.
  • Defines exclusion criteria based on stable null and non-null responses.
  • Utilizes fixed projection directions evaluated under identical audit logic.
  • GIT serves as a negative test, excluding certain descriptions without asserting alternatives.
  • Conclusions are limited to specified interventions and fixed evaluation rules.

Abstract

Preprint: This work is a preprint, has not undergone peer review, and is made publicly available to establish a public scientific record. This document defines the Geometric Inconsistency Test (GIT) as a purely protocol-level, structural criterion for excluding scalar descriptions under audit-fixed evaluation. The test introduces no physical model, no experimental realization, and no reconstructive procedure. It formalizes when a class of descriptions becomes logically inadmissible due to the coexistence of stable null and non-null responses across a priori fixed projection directions evaluated under identical audit logic. The GIT is a negative test only. It excludes a class of descriptions without asserting the existence, dimensionality, or physical reality of any alternative structure. All conclusions are categorical and restricted to the specified intervention set, projection directions, and audit-fixed evaluation rule. This definition builds strictly on the foundational framework established in Foundations of Intervention Consistency and introduces no additional assumptions. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18495497 Correspondence regarding this work may be directed to:kaya@cab-film.com

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kaya et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6988292d0fc35cd7a88495d9https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18499822
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper