Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in chronic kidney disease face barriers such as digital literacy gaps and IT misalignments, while their potential for personalized care is limited by skepticism and inconsistent protocols.
Systematic Review
Yes
While ePROMs have potential to enhance CKD care, their successful implementation requires addressing significant structural, technical, and relational barriers.
ePROMs have the potential to enhance CKD care by providing valuable insights into patient experiences. However, their adoption is hindered by digital literacy, technological issues, and inconsistent protocols. To optimize adoption, policymakers must prioritize IT integration and standardized protocols, while clinicians should actively incorporate results into consultations to validate patient input. Future research should focus on mixed-methods studies in diverse populations to ensure equitable and effective implementation.
Zheng et al. (Fri,) conducted a systematic review in Adults with chronic kidney disease including those receiving dialysis treatments. electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (ePROMs) was evaluated on Barriers, enablers and mechanisms affecting ePROM implementation in CKD management. Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in chronic kidney disease face barriers such as digital literacy gaps and IT misalignments, while their potential for personalized care is limited by skepticism and inconsistent protocols.