This analysis demonstrates improved prediction of running-related injuries using machine learning and combined risk factors.
The causes of endurance running-related injury (RRI) are multifactorial, yet little research has been conducted which utilizes multidisciplinary risk factors for individualized RRI prediction. This paper presents a machine learning (ML)-ready RRI weekly prediction dataset using evidence-based multidisciplinary risk factors. Risk factors in genetic single-nucleotide polymorphisms, history, muscular strength, biomechanics, body composition, nutrition, and training were collected from competitive endurance runners ( n = 142), who were prospectively monitored for 12 months for RRIs, accumulating 6181 weekly samples. ML models were fitted using (i) risk factors with high-level supporting evidence, and (ii) a broader range of risk factors to establish a performance baseline. Model performance (AUC = 0.784 ± 0.014) showed moderate improvement compared to previous RRI prediction modeling. Random forest achieved the best performance (AUC = 0.781 ± 0.016, 0.784 ± 0.014), which was significantly higher ( q < 0.05) than most other algorithms. Only logistic regression achieved significantly improved ( q < 0.05) performance when trained using a broader range of risk factors compared to a selection of high-quality risk factors. This study introduces a reproducible methodological framework for future ML sports injury prediction research and a valuable dataset for pooling in larger-scale analytics. Comparisons among different ML methods revealed nuanced insights into the interaction between data structure and model suitability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: