Demonstrates improved pursuit-evasion outcomes in AUVs using game theory and adaptive control strategies, implying enhanced underwater maneuverability.
Pursuit–evasion involves coupled, antagonistic decision-making and is prone to local-optimal behaviors when solved online under nonlinear dynamics and constraints. This study investigates a dual-AUV pursuit–evasion problem in ocean-current environments by integrating game theory with model predictive control (MPC). We formulated a game-theoretic MPC scheme that optimizes pursuit and evasion actions over a finite receding horizon, producing Nash-like responses. To solve the resulting nonconvex and multi-modal optimization problems reliably, we developed an Enhanced Adaptive Quantum Particle Swarm Optimization (EA-QPSO) method that incorporates chaos-based initialization and adaptive diversity-aware exploration with stagnation-escape perturbations. EA-QPSO is benchmarked against representative solvers, including fmincon, Differential Evolution (DE), and the Marine Predator Algorithm (MPA). Extensive 2D and 3D simulations demonstrate that EA-QPSO mitigates local-optimum trapping and yields more effective closed-loop behaviors, achieving longer escaping trajectories and more persistent pursuit until capture under the game formulation. In 3D scenarios, EA-QPSO better preserves high-speed motion while coordinating agile angular-rate adjustments, outperforming competing methods that exhibit premature deceleration or degraded maneuvering. These results validate the proposed framework for computing reliable competitive strategies in constrained underwater pursuit–evasion games.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: