Long-term analysis shows energy burden differences between new and old apartments in diverse climates, indicating needed interventions.
Against the backdrop of rapid urbanization and climate change, energy burden inequity arises between existing and new residential buildings due to generational differences in building envelopes. This study develops a demand-side energy burden equity assessment framework based on energy simulations of typical existing and new apartments in representative cities across China’s five major climate zones. The framework integrates multi-climate conditions, long-term evolution under different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways, and adaptable retrofit implications. Results indicate that demand-side energy burden inequity is widespread but structurally heterogeneous across climate zones, with the largest disparity observed in heating-dominated regions (up to 95.69 kWh/m2 in Harbin). Under future warming, three scaling pathways emerge: convergence in heating-dominated regions (up to −27%), divergence in cooling-dominated and mixed regions (up to +382%), and offsetting effects driven by heating–cooling structural shifts in cold regions (up to −5%). Retrofit analysis shows that combined envelope upgrades achieve substantial inequity reduction (88–152%), though with diminishing marginal returns, while single targeted measures already yield high benefits in cooling-dominated and mild regions (74% and 83%, respectively). The findings provide differentiated and forward-looking evidence to support equity-oriented interventions in urban residential retrofitting and policy design.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: