Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Investigates physiological effects in urban parks, remnant forests, and wetland parks, suggesting important planning implications.
Introduction As urbanization accelerates, understanding the specific health benefits of green spaces is crucial. This study investigates the physiological restorative effects of Urban Parks (UP), Remnant Forests (RF), and Wetland Parks (WP). Methods We employed a novel physiological health effects (PHE) threshold model and EEG data to analyze participant responses to short-term exposure in these environments, establishing efficiency and benefit thresholds. Results While all types provided benefits, they exhibited distinct patterns. UP demonstrated the most rapid and stable physiological stress reduction. Conversely, RF and WP elicited heightened physiological alertness (likely due to dense vegetation) but were subjectively perceived as having higher restorative potential due to biodiversity. Discussion The study highlights a divergence between objective physiological recovery and subjective psychological preference. We conclude that urban planning must incorporate both ecological and sensory dimensions to maximize public health benefits across different green space types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: