A comparative study examines the effects of K/DOQI guidelines on bone health markers in hemodialysis patients, suggesting limitations in clinical practice.
Background: After application of K/DOQI recommendations, a large proportion of our patients failed to reach the proposed targets. This study examined the causes of these findings. Methods: Patients (n=163) were compared in 2 periods (8 months before and after application of K/DOQI guidelines). Serum calcium (Ca), phosphorus (P), parathyroid hormone (PTH) and calcium × phosphate product (Ca x P); mean dialysate Ca content; mean doses of vitamin D; and average prescription of Ca-based phosphate binders and sevelamer in both periods were analyzed. Results: Prescription of Ca salts as phosphate-binding agents decreased and prescription of sevelamer increased in an attempt to maintain serum Ca levels between 8.4 and 9.5 mg/dL post-K/DOQI. Increased serum PTH levels were associated with decreased serum Ca levels (relative risk [RR] = 41.1, p<0.001) and increased serum P levels (RR=6.81, p<0.01). Use of dialysis fluids with Ca content of 2.5 mEq/L was associated with an increased risk of having PTH levels >300 pg/mL (RR=11.4, p<0.003). Vitamin D metabolites had to be discontinued in 26 patients (37.1% of those receiving them from study start) due to hyperphosphoremia or hypercalcemia post-K/DOQI; and serum PTH significantly increased (445.8 ± 238.2 pg/mL vs. 715.2 ± 549.5 pg/mL; p<0.001). Ninety-three patients (57%) did not receive vitamin D at study start; in 20 of those (21.5%), vitamin D had to be started post-K/DOQI. Conclusions: Clinical guidelines do not appear to be sufficient to overcome all difficulties arising in daily management of these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Arenas et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: