PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 20263 citations

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Evaluating the Survival, the Failure and the Complication Rates of Metal-Ceramic, Veneered and Monolithic All-Ceramic Tooth-Supported Multiple- Unit Fixed Dental Prostheses (Fdps).

View Full Paper
PRP RomandiniBPB E PjeturssonJPJ Pitta

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate and compare the survival, failure, and complication rates of various dental prostheses.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of existing studies.
  • Evaluated outcomes of metal-ceramic, veneered, and monolithic all-ceramic FDPs.
  • Assessed survival rates over a 5-year period and analyzed complication types.
  • Veneered and monolithic zirconia FDPs showed comparable 5-year survival rates.
  • Higher fracture rates were observed in weaker ceramics, making them less suitable.
  • Monolithic zirconia demonstrated improved resistance to chipping and framework fractures.

Abstract

Veneered and monolithic densely sintered zirconia and metal-ceramic FDPs demonstrate comparable 5-year survival. High fracture rates make weaker ceramics unsuitable for multi-unit restorations. Monolithic zirconia offers improved resistance to chipping and framework fractures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Romandini et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698979d9f0ec2af6756e7cd4https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.9666
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper