A retrospective study identifies serum albumin as a predictor of relapse in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, indicating a clinical significance.
Objective To identify predictors of relapse in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) and investigate the biological mechanisms underlying these associations using cytokine profiling. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 99 patients who achieved remission after initial treatment for IIMs or myositis-specific antibody-positive interstitial lung disease at Nagasaki University Hospital. Among 197 diagnosed patients, we included those who achieved clinical improvement and were followed up for ≥3 months, excluding early deaths and those with insufficient follow-up. Relapse was defined as disease worsening requiring treatment intensification. Risk factors were analyzed using the Cox regression analysis. Serum cytokine profiles were compared between patients with low and high pre-treatment albumin levels. Results Forty-one patients (41%) relapsed. Multivariate analysis revealed that pretreatment albumin level remained the only independent predictor of overall relapse (HR, 0.60; 95% CI: 0.40–0.92, p = 0.019). For ILD relapse, both albumin (HR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.30–0.88, p = 0.015) and female sex (HR: 0.70, 95% CI: 0.52–0.95, p = 0.022) remained independent predictors. In antibody-specific analyses, the V-neck sign strongly predicted ILD relapse in anti-ARS-positive patients (HR, 5.07; 95% CI: 1.64–15.75, p = 0.006). After false discovery rate correction, 14 cytokines remained significantly elevated in patients with low albumin levels, including IL-6 (7.5-fold, q < 0.001), IP-10 (5.3-fold, q < 0.001), and MCP-1 (2.5-fold, q < 0.001). Conclusion Pretreatment albumin levels independently predict relapse in IIMs, and cytokine profiling demonstrates that low albumin levels reflect active systemic inflammation. These findings support the use of albumin as a practical biomarker for risk stratification in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Matsuo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: