PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Forestry An International Journal of Forest Research3 citationsOpen Access

A review of forest biomass assessments based on remote sensing reveals progress in methodological quality—but major challenges remain

View Full Paper
EPEmanuele PapucciRVRubén ValbuenaCRCornelia Roberge

Key Points

  • The review assesses the methodological quality of forest biomass assessments using remote sensing from 1992 to 2022.
  • Systematic review of biomass assessment studies using remote sensing techniques.
  • Evaluation based on ideal standards derived from existing literature.
  • Comparison of survey elements to assess methodological quality.
  • Increased use of remote sensing for biomass surveys over the years.
  • Gradual improvement in methodological quality across evaluated elements.
  • Identification of five key challenges impacting future assessments.

Abstract

Abstract Reliable forest biomass assessments are becoming increasingly important, as Parties to the Climate Convention are required to report changes in multiple carbon pools, including both above- and belowground biomass. In some regions, use of remote sensing is the only viable option for obtaining such estimates, whereas in other regions it bears potential to improve the accuracy of ground inventory-based biomass estimates. However, statistically rigorous estimation through remote sensing poses several challenges. This study systematically and comprehensively reviews the methodological quality of large-area biomass assessment studies from 1992 to 2022, based on core survey elements for successful biomass surveying assisted by remote sensing. For each element, we reviewed the studies in relation to “ideal standards” derived from the literature, which served as evaluation criteria. Our review revealed an increasing trend in use of remote sensing for biomass surveys, coupled with gradual improvements in methodological quality for all survey elements evaluated. For example, advances in remote sensing techniques, particularly the increased use of Light Detection and Ranging, Radio Detection and Ranging, and digital aerial photogrammetry, all technologies able to capture information on forest structure, have enhanced the reliability of biomass estimates. However, several problems remain, such as field data scarcity for model calibration, signal saturation in high-biomass regions, and misconceptions about the use of statistical methods. We identified five remaining key challenges for improving remote sensing assisted large-area biomass assessments. These include (i) obtaining sensor data that correlate stronger with biomass, (ii) acquiring larger sets of harmonized field data at the level of trees and plots for calibrating models, (iii) adequate use of statistical principles, (iv) developing methods for domain estimation, and (v) improved quality assurance and quality control. While upcoming new airborne technologies and satellite missions may mitigate some challenges, continued methodological innovation and further enhancement of the rigor of statistical and other procedures will remain essential for advancing remote sensing-based biomass assessments.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Papucci et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a14f0ec2af6756e8557https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpag007
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper