Adaptation and validation of the School Anxiety Scale by teachers shows it reliably measures children's anxiety levels, indicating its usefulness.
The School Anxiety Scale – Teacher Report (SAS-TR) assesses children’s anxiety from the teacher’s perspective. Originally developed in English and subsequently validated in Spanish and Iranian populations, a validated Italian version is still lacking. The current study aimed to translate, adapt and validate the SAS-TR into Italian. The SAS-TR was translated from English into Italian following 5 stages of cross-cultural adaptation and was assessed for face and content validity by five primary school teachers. A sample of 66 teachers completed the SAS-TR in a community sample of 201 children aged 6–11 years. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis were performed. To investigate the concurrent validity, teachers also completed the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire-Teacher (SDQ-T). After four weeks, the teachers re-provided ratings on the SAS-TR to assess test-retest reliability. SAS-TR ratings for the same children provided by permanent teachers (who have ≥ 10 teaching hours in classroom) and specialist teachers (who have < 10 teaching hours in classroom) were compared. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the two-factor structure and the goodness fit of the scale, excluding item 12. The Italian SAS-TR exhibited strong face and content validity (mean = 3.71 ± 0.57), excellent internal consistency (α = 0.902) and almost perfect test-retest reliability over 4-weeks (ICC = 0.829). Additionally, moderate and statistically significant correlations between SAS-TR and SDQ-T “Emotional symptoms” subscale (ρ s = 0.62) supported concurrent validity. Finally, permanent teachers reported higher levels of anxiety symptoms compared to specialist teachers ( p < 0.05). Overall, the Italian version of SAS-TR demonstrates adequate psychometric properties, suggesting its suitability for assessing anxiety symptoms in children aged 6–11 by teachers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felisi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: