PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 9, 2026Soft Computing0 citationsOpen Access

The group analytic hierarchy process (G-AHP) with preference aggregation by type-2 fuzzy envelope of extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (EHFLTS)

MTMichał TomczakGPGül Polat

Key Points

  • The research aims to enhance group decision-making by efficiently aggregating preferences under uncertainty.
  • Introduced a method combining fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process and type-2 fuzzy envelope.
  • Utilized extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for capturing preferences.
  • Applied the method to a contractor selection problem for demonstration.
  • Achieved a final ranking of options without requiring input normalization.
  • Results showed improved consistency over traditional decision-making methods.
  • Demonstrated flexibility and effectiveness in handling uncertain input.

Abstract

Abstract Solving practical selection problems frequently involves analyzing imprecise and uncertain input. In the absence of unequivocal measures for ranking options, the decision maker needs to resort to pairwise comparisons and capture preferences using comparative linguistic expressions. If multiple decision-makers are involved, the complexity of analysis grows and consistency of results may become questionable. This paper proposes a group decision-making method that draws from the fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (FAHP) and utilizes the type-2 fuzzy envelope of an extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set (EHFLTS) to aggregate the preferences of multiple decision-makers. This approach avoids the need for normalization or transformation of the input, thereby reducing information loss. The method’s performance is demonstrated using a notional example of a contractor selection problem. The result (the final ranking of options) is then compared with results generated by means of methods presented in the literature. The proposed approach is a flexible and effective group decision support method that addresses key gaps observed in the existing methods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tomczak et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69897a86f0ec2af6756e8b73https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-025-11047-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A state-of-the-art survey of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS): Developments and applications2023 · 123 citations
  2. 2A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory1983 · 3,057 citations
  3. 3Extended hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and their aggregation in group decision making2014 · 132 citations
  4. 4Type-2 Fuzzy Envelope of Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Term Set: A New Representation Model of Comparative Linguistic Expression2019 · 37 citations
  5. 5Fuzzy decision making based on likelihood-based comparison relations of hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets and hesitant fuzzy linguistic operators2014 · 142 citations