Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This systematic review reveals factors affecting recruitment in preconception studies, suggesting improved strategies for diverse populations.
This review provides a quantitative synthesis of recruitment and retention patterns in preconception research, addressing a critical but understudied period to improve maternal and child health. We found that participant characteristics, recruitment strategy, and study design significantly influence recruitment rates, preconception attrition, and pregnancy retention, with important implications for feasibility assessment, anticipated loss to follow-up, and sample size estimation. Our findings highlight the need for recruitment of diverse populations and methodological tools tailored to preconception research. These findings offer empirically grounded parameters to support the design of more efficient, inclusive, and adequately powered preconception and pregnancy-related studies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kiley et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: