The whistle has long been an instructional icon in physical education (PE) learning, particularly as a command tool that signals transitions and regulates physical activities. However, amid the 21st-century pedagogical shift emphasizing deep learning, an essential question arises: is the whistle still relevant as the primary instrument in a learning process that demands reflection, meaning-making and active student participation? This study employs a descriptive quantitative approach to explore students' perceptions of whistle use in PE learning. The sample consists of 180 students spread across two schools with different geographical characteristics: SMP 1 Wonosari, Boalemo Regency, and SMP Negeri 6, Gorontalo City. The instrument, a closed-ended questionnaire, was designed based on four dimensions of student perception: focus, discipline, motor response, and pedagogical meaning. The analysis results show that 62.7% of students fall into the agree and strongly agree categories, which indicates that whistles still support concentration, orderliness, and speed in responding to teachers' instructions. However, 37.3% of respondents expressed discomfort with the repetitive and contextually meaningless use of whistles, which is inconsistent with a reflective learning approach. The conclusion of this study confirms that whistles still have an important function in physical education learning, particularly as a marker of rhythm and regulator of classroom dynamics. However, to meet the pedagogical demands of the deep learning era, whistles need to be repositioned as instruments that are not merely technical tools, but rather part of a meaningful, contextual, and reflective learning process.
Hariadi Said (Fri,) studied this question.