Develops HPLC fingerprint analysis for evaluating the quality of peony root bark epidermis, suggesting resource optimization.
The annual output of Moutan Cortex is significant, but the epidermis of the root bark of peony (EPRP), as a by-product of Moutan Cortex, is typically discarded. To achieve full use of resources, this study aimed to develop an HPLC fingerprint analysis method using HPLC-DAD-ESI-MS/MS on EPRP sourced from different regions to establish EPRP quality control standards. For chromatography, a ShimPack Scepter C18 column (4.6 mm × 250 mm, 5 μm) was used. The mobile phase for HPLC consisted of acetonitrile (A) and a 0.1% aqueous formic acid solution (B). An HPLC fingerprint was established, featuring 30 characteristic peaks with a similarity of over 0.80. A total of 31 components were identified, with 22 chemical markers determined, including 1-galloylglucose, gallic acid, methyl gallate, oxypaeoniflora, paeonolide, apiopaeonoside, albiflorin, paeoniflorin, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid, 1,2,3,6-tetragalloylglucose, ellagic acid, galloylpaeoniflorin, luteoloside, 1,2,3,4,6-O-penta-galloylglucose, diosmin, neodiosmin, resveratrol, mudanpioside C, benzoyloxypaeoniflorin, benzoylpaeoniflorin, and paeonol. These markers align with component structure theory, allowing for the analysis of the structural characteristics of EPRP from different regions. These findings provide a valuable reference for the future quality evaluation of EPRP, enhance the understanding of the components in EPRP from diverse sources, and lay a foundation for the development and greater utilization of EPRP.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: