Countless new machine learning models are published every year and are reported to significantly advance the state-of-the-art in top-n recommendation. However, earlier reproducibility studies indicate that progress in this area may be quite limited, due to widespread methodological issues, e.g., comparisons with untuned baseline models, creating an illusion of progress . In this work, we examine whether these problems persist in today’s research by attempting to reproduce nine SIGIR 2023 and 2024 recommendation algorithms based on Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models, a recent but rapidly expanding research area. Only 25% of reported results are fully reproducible and, since the original papers relied on weak baselines , they do not establish the superiority of diffusion models over state-of-the-art methods. In our controlled evaluations, well-tuned simpler baselines consistently exceed the diffusion-based models’ effectiveness reported in the original papers. Furthermore, we identify key mismatches between the characteristics of diffusion models and those of the traditional top-n recommendation task, raising doubts about their suitability for recommendation. Moreover, in the analyzed papers, the generative capabilities of these models are constrained to a minimum. Overall, our results call for greater scientific rigor and a disruptive change in the research and publication culture in this area.
Benigni et al. (Fri,) studied this question.