PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 10, 20262 citations

Design and validation of a high-speed rotor balancer based on influence coefficient method and dual-speed control.

PGPourya Kord GharehchelooFSFarhad Fani SaberiMSMahnaz Shamshirsaz

Key Points

  • The aim is to design and validate a high-speed rotor balancer using the influence coefficient method for better mass correction.
  • Designed a balancer utilizing the influence coefficient method for mass correction.
  • Controlled rotor speeds with PWM pulse generation and gear-based transmission.
  • Measured force magnitude and phase using load cells and optical proximity sensors.
  • Conducted modal analysis to find natural frequencies and ensure safe operational speeds.
  • Performed motion simulation to validate equations and check sensor misalignment effects.
  • Achieved a lowest natural frequency of 216 Hz, allowing operation at speeds up to 9500 RPM.
  • Validated the model's accuracy regarding the effects of sensor misalignment.
  • Determined a misalignment tolerance of up to 0.25 mm.

Abstract

Balancing of rotors requires a specialized device known as a balancer, which measures centrifugal forces by rotating the rotor and applies corrective masses to achieve balance. Higher rotational speeds enhance the accuracy of the balancing process due to more pronounced centrifugal effects. In this study, a novel balancer is designed that employs the influence coefficient method for mass correction. The rotor's speed is controlled through a dual mechanism: PWM pulse generation and a gear-based transmission system. Force magnitude and phase are measured using load cells and an optical proximity sensor. Modal analysis of the balancer structure reveals a lowest natural frequency of 216 Hz, enabling safe operation at speeds up to 9500 RPM without inducing unwanted vibrations. Additionally, motion simulation was conducted to validate the governing equations and assess the impact of sensor misalignment. Results confirm the accuracy of the model and indicate a misalignment tolerance of up to 0.25 mm.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Gharehcheloo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698acac07c832249c30ba242https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-38071-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper