This article examines violence in familial relationships, revealing its social persistence and implications.
This article examines violence within intimate and familial relations as a structurally reproducible social mechanism rather than a series of discrete acts or moral deviations. Drawing on nineteenth-century classical literature, the analysis demonstrates how violence remains socially compatible so long as it operates within normative frameworks of family, morality, and economic dependency. The focus is placed on the conditions under which harm becomes permissible, misrecognized, or rendered illegible prior to reaching criminally recognizable thresholds. By tracing mechanisms of economic appropriation, moral rationalization, and institutional non-recognition, the article shows how vulnerability is produced in advance and exit from violence remains structurally constrained. The comparison between classical literary material and contemporary contexts reveals not historical specificity, but the durability of an underlying social order in which violence persists through normativity rather than transgression. The article contributes to sociological and interdisciplinary debates on violence, social order, and recognition by conceptualizing harm as a stable regime embedded in everyday structures rather than as episodic rupture.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Darya Spiridonov (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: