Exploratory meta-analysis reveals challenges in machine learning diagnostics for movement disorders, suggesting future focus areas.
ML models using DTI demonstrate high internal performance across studies, although generalizability remains limited across multiple movement disorders; however, current evidence remains exploratory due to small sample sizes, methodological fragmentation, and a lack of standardized imaging pipelines. Rather than confirmatory inference, these findings provide a descriptive map of emerging trends in ML-DTI diagnostics. Future progress will depend on data harmonization initiatives, multicenter collaborations, and federated learning frameworks that can support reproducible, generalizable, and clinically interpretable models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fathollahi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: