OpenEar demonstrates accurate phenotyping of maize ears, suggesting a new accessible tool for crop breeding.
Crop phenotyping of important agronomic traits in field conditions at single-plant resolution has long been a major bottleneck in both genetic analysis (e.g. large-scale association/linkage analysis) and breeding applications (e.g. genomic prediction/selection). Despite growing interest, ultra-affordable, high-throughput and accurate phenotyping tools for maize ears remain limited. Here, we developed OpenEar, an open source, low-cost phenotyping system that combines a DIY maize ear imaging platform with a deep learning-based end-to-end phenotypic data extraction pipeline. The imaging platform is composed of 3D-printed parts and electronics components easily available from local retailers to perform high-quality 360° surface scanning of maize ears. Our pipeline first employs CNN-based models to identify normally-developed ears suitable for phenotyping, followed by reliable segmentation of ears and ear surface projection images by YOLOv11-based models, from which ten key traits are subsequently extracted. OpenEar demonstrates reliable agreement with manual measurements across a diverse set of ear- and kernel-related traits, including ear length (R² = 0.972), ear diameter (R² = 0.905), ear volume (R² = 0.976), ear weight (R² = 0.878), kernel number (R² = 0.98), kernel row number (R² = 0.888), kernel number per row (R² = 0.852), kernel thickness (R² = 0.705), kernel width (R² = 0.515), and thousand kernel weight (R² = 0.605). A user-friendly graphical interface is developed for manual inspection of ears after computer annotation. Manually annotated ear videos and images are publicly released as a resource for the crop phenomics community. Our study highlights the potential of DIY-based low-cost solutions to make phenotyping more accessible in crop genetic analysis and breeding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: