Comparative legal policy analysis explores VAT policy design lessons for non-EU jurisdictions, suggesting actionable pathways to improve compliance.
Platform-mediated business models have expanded the scale, speed, and cross-border footprint of taxable consumption while weakening tax-administration visibility under conventional value-added tax (VAT) compliance cycles. This paper derives implementable policy design lessons for non‑EU jurisdictions from the European Union’s VAT in the Digital Age (ViDA) package (Council Directive (EU) 2025/516; Council Regulation (EU) 2025/517; Council Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/518). Using comparative legal policy analysis anchored in the destination principle and OECD consistent VAT design, the study decomposes ViDA into three transferable modules: (A) digital reporting requirements (DRR) and structured e-invoicing, (B) platform-deemed supplier liability in selected sectors, and (C) single registration/simplification. Results provide sequencing options and a control–impact matrix and demonstrate present–future comparisons through scenario projections of VAT-gap reduction (2023–2035). The paper concludes that effective digital VAT policy requires aligning legal liability with information advantage, building a data-to-action compliance loop, and applying SME proportionality safeguards to preserve innovation and contestability
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
A. V. N. Murty (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: