PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Marine Science and Engineering0 citationsOpen Access

Comparative Analysis of Performance and Emissions of a Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine According to CPP Modes

JMJaesung Moon

Key Points

  • The aim is to compare performance and emissions of a two-stroke marine diesel engine operated with different controllable pitch propeller modes.
  • Conducted full-scale measurements on T/S Baek-Kyung with a MAN B&W engine under IMO Tier II conditions.
  • Compared two CPP control strategies: constant-speed and combinator modes.
  • Analyzed engine performance across a load range of 25-75% SMCR, focusing on specific fuel consumption and emissions.
  • Combinator mode improved fuel efficiency, reducing SFOC by up to 10.5 g/kWh at 25% load.
  • Shaft torque increased by up to 47% under the combinator mode.
  • Higher estimated emissions at low load, with BSNOx increasing from 13.61 to 16.95 g/kWh.

Abstract

This study experimentally investigates the performance and exhaust emission characteristics of a low-speed two-stroke marine diesel engine operated with different controllable pitch propeller (CPP) modes during actual sea operation. Full-scale measurements were conducted on the training vessel T/S Baek-Kyung, equipped with a MAN B&W 5S35ME-B9.5 engine, operating under IMO Tier II fallback (FB) conditions. Two CPP control strategies were compared: a constant-speed mode, in which engine speed was maintained at approximately 162 rpm and load was controlled by propeller pitch, and a combinator mode, in which engine speed and pitch were jointly controlled. In the combinator mode, the propeller pitch reached saturation (100%) at approximately 25% load, and further load variation was governed primarily by engine speed. The analysis focused on an engine-load range of approximately 25–75% SMCR and evaluated propulsion performance, including specific fuel oil consumption (SFOC) and shaft torque, together with estimated brake-specific exhaust emissions expressed in g/kWh. The combinator mode achieved superior fuel efficiency under partial-load conditions, reducing SFOC by up to 10.5 g/kWh (5.4%) at 25% load, while increasing shaft torque by up to 47%, indicating improved engine–propeller matching. However, this benefit was accompanied by higher estimated emissions at low load, with BSNOx increasing from 13.61 to 16.95 g/kWh. As engine load increased, differences in both performance and emissions between the two modes diminished. These results reveal a clear load-dependent trade-off between fuel efficiency and exhaust emissions in CPP operation and emphasize the importance of load-based switching or optimal joint control strategies under off-design conditions.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jaesung Moon (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c22267fb587c655e57chttps://doi.org/10.3390/jmse14040331
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Shaft-Power-Based Load Reconstruction for Operating-Point Alignment During Sea Trials of a CPP-Equipped Two-Stroke Marine Diesel Engine2026
  2. 2Efficiency Comparison and Optimal Voyage Strategy of CPP Combination and Fixed Modes Based on Ship Operational Data2025
  3. 3Efficiency Comparison and Optimal Voyage Strategy of CPP Combination and Fixed Modes Based on Ship Operational Data2025 · 1 citations
  4. 4Quantitative Regime Comparison and Engine Performance Assessment: Regime-Dependent Baselining and Comparison for In-Service Propulsion Evaluation2026
  5. 5Study the ship engine speed limiter effect with testbed experiment and on-board measurement, and comparative analysis with testbed propeller cycle responses2026