PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026Journal of Family Psychology0 citationsOpen Access

Can measuring coercive conflict in family dyads be easier? The psychometrics of coercion measures.

View Full Paper
ASAmy M Smith SlepRHRichard E HeymanKDKelly A. Daly

Key Points

  • The research aims to simplify the measurement of coercive conflict in family and partner dyads.
  • Developed new measures for coercive conflict assessment.
  • Examined concurrent and convergent validity of the measures.
  • Included parent-child and intimate partner dyads for evaluation.
  • New measures displayed mixed but encouraging signs of validity.
  • Supports future low-cost measures for assessing coercive conflict in health care.

Abstract

Coercion theory has profoundly impacted our understanding of aggressive behavior in relationships; coercive processes are linked with numerous negative psychological and physical health outcomes. Coercion theory's influence on the aggression and violence literature is remarkable given that standard measurement requires painstaking, moment-by-moment coding of direct observation of dyadic interactions-an expensive, time-consuming endeavor. Thus, we sought to develop less costly and less cumbersome ways to measure coercive conflict. To assess the preliminary psychometrics of our resulting measurement system, we examined concurrent and convergent validity of (a) globally coded observer ratings of coercion and (b) participant-reported coercion in parent-child (n = 79) and intimate partner (n = 71) dyads. Overall, our new measures show mixed but encouraging signs of convergent and concurrent validity. Future low-cost measures may allow for the assessment of coercive conflict in mental and physical health care and expand research on this important dyadic process. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Slep et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c33267fb587c655e6cahttps://doi.org/10.1037/fam0001451
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Coercive control in a national U.S. self-report survey: Prediction of repeated intimate partner violence.2024 · 7 citations
  2. 2The Experience of the Coercive Control Scale: Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties2023
  3. 3Healthcare Provider-Based Contraceptive Coercion: Understanding U.S. Patient Experiences and Describing Implications for Measurement2024 · 15 citations
  4. 4Measures of Potentially Mutual Violence for Evaluating Conflict Resolution or Restorative Justice Programs2026
  5. 5Does Coercive Process Play a Role in Teen Dating Violence?2026