PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 2026The American Journal of Sports Medicine2 citationsOpen Access

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction vs Nonoperative Treatment for Recurrent Lateral Patellar Dislocation: Three-Year Results From a Randomized Controlled Trial

View Full Paper
TSTruls Martin Straume-NæsheimPRPer-Henrik RandsborgTNTina Løkken Nilsgård

Key Points

  • To assess the effectiveness of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction versus active rehabilitation in preventing recurrent lateral patellar dislocation.
  • Randomized controlled trial design
  • Participants aged 12 to 30 with recurrent lateral patellar dislocation
  • Comparison between isolated MPFL reconstruction and active rehabilitation
  • Follow-up assessed patient-reported knee function scores at baseline and 3 years
  • 5 out of 30 patients (16.7%) in the MPFL group reported instability after 3 years compared to 15 out of 31 patients (53.6%) in the control group
  • Odds ratio for instability in control group was 5.8
  • Both groups showed significant improvements in knee function scores over time, but no significant differences between groups at follow-up

Abstract

Background: Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFL-R) is the primary surgical intervention for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation (LPD). Isolated MPFL-R is recommended for patients without anatomic high-risk factors that predispose to further dislocations. Purpose: To compare instability recurrence in patients with recurrent LPD without underlying anatomic risk factors treated with MPFL-R versus active rehabilitation. Study Design: Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: Patients aged 12 to 30 years with recurrent LPD and no underlying anatomic high-risk factors for further dislocations—specifically, no severe trochlear dysplasia (Dejour D) and a tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove distance ≤20 mm on computed tomography—were randomized to receive knee arthroscopy with isolated MPFL-R followed by active rehabilitation (MPFL group) or knee arthroscopy without reconstruction followed by active rehabilitation (control group). The primary outcome was subjective persistent patellar instability at 3 years. Knee function at baseline and 1 and 3 years was assessed by the following patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) scores: Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Kujala Knee Score, Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Noyes Sports Activity Rating Scale. Results: Between 2010 and 2019, 61 patients (72.1% female) were included in the study and randomized, with 30 assigned to the MPFL group and 31 to the control group. At 3-year follow-up, subjective persistent patellar instability was reported by 5 patients in the MPFL group (16.7%) versus 15 patients in the control group (53.6%), corresponding to an odds ratio of 5.8 (95% CI, 1.7-19.4; P = .003). Both groups reported significant improvements in all PROM scores from baseline to 3 years. However, no significant differences in PROM scores were observed between the groups at any follow-up time point. Conclusion: Isolated MPFL-R was more effective than active rehabilitation alone in preventing patellar instability after 3 years. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.org (NCT02263807).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Straume-Næsheim et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c73267fb587c655ee7ahttps://doi.org/10.1177/03635465261416931
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Isolated Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction for Recurrent Patellar Instability Regardless of Tibial Tubercle–Trochlear Groove Distance and Patellar Height: Minimum 5-Year Outcomes2024 · 27 citations
  2. 2Short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent and first-time traumatic patellar dislocation with severe trochlear dysplasia, increased tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove distance, patella alta and lower extremity torsion deformities.2026
  3. 3Lateral Retinacular Release During MPFL Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial2025
  4. 4Major risk factors do not influence the outcomes of isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction in athletes with patellar instability: a prospective cohort study2026
  5. 5The dynamic reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament shows good subjective outcomes but high rates of recurrent instability: a systematic review and meta-analysis2025