PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 11, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Depth-Coherence Hypothesis: A Structural Perspective on Hallucinations as "Coherence Bridges" in Transformers

View Full Paper
NSNicol Stolze

Key Points

  • This research proposes the Depth-Coherence Hypothesis, suggesting a structural role of hallucinations in Transformers.
  • Conceptual framework developed around the Depth-Coherence Hypothesis.
  • Analyzes hallucinations through structural perspectives rather than statistical errors.
  • Calls for empirical measurement strategies involving internal activations and attention patterns.
  • Proposes hallucinations can function as coherence bridges during model inference.
  • Suggests depth-localized structural blockage may occur under conflicting objectives.
  • Highlights a potential trade-off between fluent continuity and factual accuracy.

Abstract

The Depth-Coherence Hypothesis: A Structural Perspective on Hallucinations as “Coherence Bridges” in Transformers is a conceptual hypothesis proposal. Hallucinations in Large Language Models (LLMs) are often treated as training artifacts or statistical errors observed only at the output level. This note proposes a structural perspective: hallucinations may function as a “bridge” that preserves continuation when a model encounters a depth-wise discontinuity during inference. The core shift is conceptual: for a Transformer in a single forward pass, layer depth can be treated as an analogue of temporal dynamics in biological coherence theories. We hypothesize that safety constraints or strongly conflicting objectives can induce a structural blockage that is depth-localized (often hypothesized near mid-depth, but not assumed). The model then compensates by widening internal routing, enabling fluent continuation while weakening factual anchoring in a subset of cases. Scope: This record reports no experiments and no empirical results. It is intended as a falsifiable hypothesis proposal and a call for measurement by researchers with access to internal activations, attention patterns, or mechanistic interpretability tooling. The appendix provides an operational measurement sketch (pre-registration, negative controls, length controls, and robustness checks).

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Nicol Stolze (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698c1c73267fb587c655ee8chttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18529399
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper