Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article explores magical thinking and AI interactions, highlighting coping strategies and ethical considerations in uncertainty.
This article explores how humans engage in magical thinking and create imaginary entities as adaptive coping strategies under prolonged uncertainty. Drawing on recent research on anxiety, intolerance of uncertainty, and psychological distress (Adamis et al., 2024; Godara et al., 2023; Becerra et al., 2023), it argues that such behaviors are not relics of pre-scientific cultures but universal cognitive mechanisms. The study further examines how interactions with artificial intelligence can trigger similar processes of externalizing agency, forming quasi-personalized digital helpers. By linking phenomenology, psychology, and AI ethics, the article highlights both adaptive functions and ethical considerations of these emerging forms of human-technology interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emma Rybnikova (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: