Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This pilot study evaluates changes in muscle activity and psychological outcomes in knee osteoarthritis patients cycling with different electronic assistance levels, suggesting potential benefits...
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (KOA) often results in reduced physical activity. This exploratory study evaluated lower limb muscle activity across three e-cycling assistance levels and examined e-cycling’s influence on kinesiophobia, stress and exercise motivation in individuals with KOA. Methods: Ten participants cycled with no, low and high assistance on an e-bike. Muscle activity and knee kinematics were measured using surface electromyography and inertia measurement units. A subset of four participants completed questionnaires assessing kinesiophobia (TSK-17), perceived stress (PSS), and exercise motivation (BREQ-3). Muscle activity across the three levels of assistance was analysed using a linear mixed-effects model. Results: Peak and mean muscle activity of rectus femoris (p = 0.01; 0.039), vastus medialis oblique (p = 0.0002; 0.001) and biceps femoris (p = 0.002; 0.03) were lower during high-assistance compared to the no-assistance cycling. No significant differences were observed in mean muscle activity between no- and low-assistance cycling. Reported exertion and pain were low during e-cycling, with kinesiophobia (M = 35.8 ± 2.5 to 33.3 ± 3.5) decreasing following e-cycling, whereas perceived stress (M = 14 ± 5.7 to 14.5 ± 3.3) increased marginally in our small sample. In the small subgroup of participants, the Behaviour Regulation Exercise Questionnaire outcomes increased in four out of six subscores post-exercise. Conclusions: Considering the differences in muscle activity recorded, and given that this is a pilot study, we propose that e-cycling may be an ideal way of introducing graded exercise to KOA patients, potentially allowing them to maintain physical activity and self-management of their disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Choo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: