Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Motion planning improves efficiency and reliability in on-road autonomous driving by adjusting accuracy based on distance.
Motion planning for on-road autonomous driving requires generating locally accurate spatio-temporal trajectories over a finite horizon, while facing increasing uncertainty and interaction variability toward distant regions. However, most existing planners employ uniform planning accuracy along the horizon, which implicitly treats far-field predictions with the same fidelity as near-term execution. This uniform treatment often leads to unnecessary computational effort and reduced planning efficiency without improving near-field feasibility. This paper presents an economical motion planning framework that allocates planning accuracy according to the spatio-temporal distance from the ego vehicle. The framework preserves high-fidelity planning in the near field where execution is imminent, while progressively reducing resolution and solution depth in the far field where uncertainty dominates and replanning is expected. A two-stage architecture is adopted, combining a distance-aware search for coarse path and velocity generation with distance-sensitive numerical refinement that prioritizes near-field feasibility under receding horizon execution. The simulation results demonstrate improved computational efficiency and planning reliability compared with uniform resolution baselines. Real-world experiments validate the stable online replanning performance in dynamic environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: