Demonstrates the relationship of ex(n,H) with forb(n,H) in degenerate hypergraphs, implying new findings in extremal combinatorics.
Two central problems in extremal combinatorics are concerned with estimating the number ex(n,H) , the size of the largest H -free hypergraph on n vertices, and the number forb(n,H) of H -free hypergraph on n vertices. It is well known that forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) for k -uniform hypergraphs that are not k -partite. In a recent breakthrough, Ferber, McKinley, and Samotij proved that for many k -partite (or degenerate ) hypergraphs H , forb(n, H) = 2O(ex(n, H)) . However, there are few known instances of degenerate hypergraphs H for which forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) holds. In this paper, we show that forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) holds for a wide class of degenerate hypergraphs known as $2$ -contractible hypertrees. This is the first known infinite family of degenerate hypergraphs H for which forb(n,H)=2(1+o(1))ex(n,H) holds. As a corollary of our main results, we obtain a sharp estimate of forb(n,C⁽ᵏ⁾_ )=2^( -1/2 +o(1)) nk-1 for the k -uniform linear -cycle, for all pairs k≥ 5, ≥ 3 , thus settling a question of Balogh, Narayanan, and Skokan affirmatively for all k≥ 5, ≥ 3 . Our methods also lead to some sharp results on the related random Turán problem. As a key ingredient of our proofs, we develop a novel supersaturation variant of the delta systems method for set systems, which may be of independent interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jiang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: