PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
July 31, 2021The American Journal of Cardiology37 citationsOpen Access

Prevalence and Long-term Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Artery Ectasia Presenting with Acute Myocardial Infarction

XWXu WangJMJosé M. Montero-CabezasAMAlessandro Mandurino‐Mirizzi

Key Result

Coronary artery ectasia was found in 3.6% of AMI patients and was independently associated with a 59.7% higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up.

Structured PICO

Does the presence of coronary artery ectasia increase the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction?

P
Population
4,788 consecutive patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) referred for acute invasive coronary angiography, mean age 63 ± 13 years, 73.9% male. Excluded: previous history of coronary artery bypass grafting.
I
Intervention
Presence of coronary artery ectasia (CAE), defined as dilation of a coronary segment with a diameter ≥1.5 times of the adjacent normal segment
C
Comparator
Absence of coronary artery ectasia (CAE)
O
Outcome
Composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including cardiac death, myocardial infarction, stroke and repeated coronary revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting) at median 4 years follow-upcomposite

In patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction, the presence of coronary artery ectasia is relatively low (3.6%) but is independently associated with a 1.6-fold increased risk of major adverse cardiovascular events at 4 years.

Limitations

  • Single-center, observational retrospective analysis
  • Exclusion of patients with previous coronary artery bypass graft surgery may imply a selection bias
  • Systematic evaluation of intracoronary thrombus burden according to the TIMI thrombus scale was only performed in patients with CAE
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention optimization with intracoronary imaging was not routinely performed
  • Relatively small sample size of patients with CAE may lead to underestimation of the association between CAE and MACE

Abstract

Coronary artery ectasia (CAE) is described in 5% of patients undergoing coronary angiography. Previous studies have shown controversial results regarding the prognostic impact of CAE. The prevalence and prognostic value of CAE in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain unknown. In 4788 patients presenting with AMI referred for coronary angiography the presence of CAE (defined as dilation of a coronary segment with a diameter ≥1.5 times of the adjacent normal segment) was confirmed in 174 (3.6%) patients (age 62 ± 12 years; 81% male), and was present in the culprit vessel in 79.9%. Multivessel CAE was frequent (67%). CAE patients were more frequently male, had high thrombus burden and were treated more often with thrombectomy and less often was stent implantation. Markis I was the most frequent angiographic phenotype (43%). During a median follow-up of 4 years (1-7), 1243 patients (26%) experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE): 282 (6%) died from a cardiac cause, 358 (8%) had a myocardial infarction, 945 (20%) underwent coronary revascularization and 58 (1%) presented with a stroke. Patients with CAE showed higher rates of MACE as compared to those without CAE (36.8% versus 25.6%; p <0.001). On multivariable analysis, CAE was associated with MACE (HR 1.597; 95% CI 1.238-2.060; p <0.001) after adjusting for risk factors, type of AMI and number of narrowed coronary arteries. In conclusion, the prevalence of CAE in patients presenting with AMI is relatively low but was independently associated with an increased risk of MACE at follow-up.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2021) studied this question. Coronary artery ectasia was found in 3.6% of AMI patients and was independently associated with a 59.7% higher risk of major adverse cardiovascular events during follow-up.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698cb215244806f74a107256https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.06.037
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper