N-terminal pro-BNP had a higher negative predictive value (NPV 0.97) than BNP (NPV 0.87) for ruling out heart failure in patients referred from primary care.
Does the measurement of plasma BNP and NTproBNP accurately diagnose or rule out heart failure in patients referred from primary care with suspected heart failure?
Patients referred by their general practitioners (GPs) with symptoms suggestive of heart failure
Measurement of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NTproBNP)
Resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
Diagnostic accuracy for heart failure (Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, likelihood ratios, and area under the ROC curves)
Plasma BNP and NTproBNP are highly effective 'rule-out' tests for heart failure in primary care referrals, and an abnormal ECG adds little predictive value to NTproBNP.
Tasa de eventos absoluta: 0% vs 0%
Abstract Objectives To determine the diagnostic accuracy of the measurement of plasma B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and N-terminal pro-BNP (NTproBNP) in patients referred by their general practitioners (GPs) with symptoms suggestive of heart failure. Additionally, to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the resting 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) with that of the peptides. Design A diagnostic accuracy study. Setting Rapid-access heart failure clinics in five hospitals. Participants 306 patients referred by their GPs with suspected heart failure. Main outcome measures Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV) and positive and negative likelihood ratios for BNP, NTproBNP and the ECG for the diagnosis of heart failure. Area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves for the two natriuretic peptides. Results The diagnosis of heart failure was confirmed in 104 (34%) patients. The area under the ROC curve was 0.84 95% CI 0.79−0.89 for BNP and 0.85 0.81−0.90 for NTproBNP. At the manufacturers’ recommended decision cut-points, NTproBNP provided a higher NPV (0.97) than BNP (0.87), but at lower PPV (0.44 versus 0.59). An abnormal ECG did not add any further predictive value to that of NTproBNP. Conclusions We have confirmed the value of the measurement of plasma BNP or NTproBNP as a ‘rule-out’ test for heart failure in patients currently referred by GPs to rapid access diagnostic clinics. A simple classification of the 12-lead ECG into ‘normal’ or ‘abnormal’ adds little value to ruling out heart failure in these circumstances. Further work is necessary to establish the best decision cut-points for use in clinical practice.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Zaphiriou et al. (Sat,) reported a other. N-terminal pro-BNP had a higher negative predictive value (NPV 0.97) than BNP (NPV 0.87) for ruling out heart failure in patients referred from primary care.
synapsesocial.com/papers/698cd0ae244806f74a1072a7 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejheart.2005.01.022
Alex Zaphiriou
Stephen Robb
Novartis (Switzerland)
Tarita Murray‐Thomas
European Journal of Heart Failure
University College London
Lung Institute
Glasgow Royal Infirmary
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...