Large-scale thematic analysis identifies and visualizes research trends in Slovak university theses, suggesting effective topic modeling techniques.
This research presents a large-scale thematic analysis of 66,002 Slovak university thesis abstracts, aimed at identifying, categorizing, and visualizing research trends across multiple academic disciplines. Using BERTopic for unsupervised topic modeling with K-Means clustering, 3000 distinct thematic clusters were extracted through rigorous coherence optimization, with each topic characterized by representative keywords derived from class-based TF-IDF weighting. Text embeddings were generated using SlovakBERT-STS, a domain-adapted Slovak BERT model fine-tuned for semantic textual similarity, producing 768-dimensional vectors that enable precise computation of cosine similarity between topics, resulting in a 3000 × 3000 topic similarity matrix. The optimal topic count was determined through systematic evaluation of K values ranging from 1000 to 10,000, with K = 3000 identified as the optimal configuration based on coherence elbow analysis, yielding a mean coherence score of 0.433. Thematic relationships were visualized through Multidimensional Scaling (MDS) projection to 3-D space, where convex hull geometries reveal semantic boundaries and topic separability. The methodology incorporates dynamic stopword filtering, Stanza-based lemmatization for Slovak morphology, and UMAP dimensionality reduction, achieving a balanced distribution of approximately 22 abstracts per topic. Results demonstrate that fine-grained topic models with 3000 clusters can extract meaningful semantic structure from multi-domain, morphologically complex Slovak academic corpora, despite inherent coherence constraints. The reproducible pipeline provides a framework for large-scale topic discovery, coherence-driven optimization, and geometric visualization of thematic relationships in academic text collections.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pohorenec et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: