PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 12, 2026Retina2 citations

Non-invasive evaluation of diabetic retinal neovascularization using 24×20 mm ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography angiography

View Full Paper
KZKangyan ZhengPLPeiyao LuJHJiayi Huang

Key Points

  • To evaluate how well 24×20 mm UWF-OCTA detects diabetic retinal neovascularization compared to other imaging techniques.
  • Cross-sectional design involving eyes with diabetic retinopathy
  • Comparison of UWF-OCTA, UWF-CFP, and UWF-FA imaging
  • Assessment of sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
  • Utilization of Optos California and Toward Pi BM400K systems for imaging
  • UWF-OCTA showed high sensitivity (0.97) and specificity (1.0) for detecting NV
  • Established excellent agreement with UWF-FA (ICC=0.994)
  • Combining UWF-OCTA with UWF-CFP enhanced NV detection (ICC=0.988)

Abstract

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of detecting diabetic retinal neovascularization (NV) by single captured 24×20mm ultra-widefield optical coherence tomography angiography (UWF-OCTA) with ultra-widefield color fundus photography (UWF-CFP) and ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWF-FA). Methods: This cross-sectional study included eyes with diabetic retinopathy (DR) undergoing UWF-FA, UWF-CFP, and UWF-OCTA at Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital (February 2022–May 2023). Images were captured using the Optos California system for UWF-CFP and UWF-FA, and the Toward Pi BM400K system for UWF-OCTA. NV was graded based on defined criteria for each imaging modality, with FA serving as the gold standard. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), specificity and sensitivity were analyzed by SPSS v19. ICC assessed agreement between UWF-OCTA and the other modalities, while specificity and sensitivity were calculated using UWF-FA as the reference. Results: Among ninety eyes (56 participants), UWF-OCTA demonstrated high sensitivity (0.97), specificity (1.0), and accuracy (0.99) for NV detection. UWF-OCTA and UWF-FA showed excellent agreement in NV count within the 24×20 mm field (ICC=0.994, P<0.001) and in total number (ICC=0.904, 95%CI: 0.742-0.959, P<0.001). Combing UWF-OCTA and UWF-CFP panoramically improved NV detection(ICC=0.988, 95%CI: 0.975-0.994, P<0.001). Conclusions: 24×20 mm UWF-OCTA is highly effective for NV detection, with excellent agreement to UWF-FA. Combined with UWF-CFP, it serves as a reliable, non-invasive alternative to FA for DR evaluation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zheng et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/698d6d795be6419ac0d52622https://doi.org/10.1097/iae.0000000000004790
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper